received as of 8:15 am
Trevor:
I always saw Trevor as a great speaker. He always seemed confident in what he was talking about and it made me believe that what he was saying was true. Trevor had always spoken with a lot of enthusiasm and excitement meaning that he is really into what he is talking about. I thought that it was good that he used his resources by using his water bottle as the tank and his phone as the grow bed. Even though he is an extremely good speaker I feel that the content needs a few edits. He did not seem to know the real meaning of what aquaponics is. He got half of it right saying that aquaponics is a mix of hydroponics. Then, he said using the mix of hydroponics and growing fish and plants was a great blend. I think that the information being presented needs to be more factual.
Reyn:
Reyn was a really good presenter. I like how he started off by saying what aquaponics is and explaining how it works. Mentioning how nitrites are turned into nitrates really helps the content area. He was very good with persuasion. The tone and enthusiasm in his voice really catches peoples attention. The way he seems confident will get people into believing what he is saying is real and can be convinced into purchasing their product. He used hand gestures to help explain his model and what he was talking about. The information was correct and similar to some of the things I said in my 2 videos. Reyn reached the target of speaking and content.
Coltrane: I thought that coltranes video reached target. The reason for this was because he had great detail and explained everything well, but there were some awkward pauses where he looked completely stuck and had no idea what he would be saying next. His speech was very good other then a few stumbles. He enunciated well and spoke at a good volume. I liked his first explanation of what Aquaponics is and how he went into detail about what specifically the two components are the make up Aquaponics. Everything he stated were true facts that could become useful for the audience. He has good eye contact and doesn’t fidget around a lot but has good posture.
Alyssa: I think that Alyssa’s video could use a little improvement. To where it’s at the point where it is in-between target and needs development. Although at some points she stumbled along with her words she always kept continuing not stoping or making awkward motions. This made her seem more confident, or as if the pauses were maybe even planed out for her. Her eye contact and volume at which she talked we’re both very good. Everything she said was factual as well. The one major improvement that she would need would to fill in her long breaks where she looks a bit lost.
Tyler's speech was a target speech;
This is because he was quiet confident and had good movement but
ranted on and content wasn't too strong. He stood confidently, and
spoke in a calm voice but was a little monotone. Gestures and posture
was good. Guessing the sizes of everything looked unprofessional. I
did learn a bit about a design team and what steps are taking to
create a product. He didn't say something interesting or thought
provoking about aquaponics but he did interest me about his topic of
the steps and progress.
Coltrane's speech was target;
I believe this because it was mastery except his messing around and
off the cuff feeling. His speech was very direct and professional
except the beginning and end. His posture and voice was good, calm,
and persuasive. His hand gestures were too violent and sometimes gave
off a feeling of anxiety. His rare but fatal stumbles gave his speech
a very impromptu feeling and didn't seem prepared. His eye contact
swayed. Not much energy and enunciation sometimes faded softly.
Content was target to mastery. I was interested in what he was saying
the whole time. His information seemed thought through and with high
intelligence on the subject. Had factual info about aquaponics and I
learned from his speech.
Noah. I think he had a good process but sometimes he mumbled. He talked loud and clear but at times when he didn’t know what to say, he got soft and he started to mumble. His thought process was there most of the time and he sounded confident, but when he got stuck, his confidence went down and he started to mumble.
Blaine. Blaine talked loud and clear 90% of the time and he knew what he was gonna say before he said it and you could tell he was an expert on aquaponics because he sounded calm and relaxed like this was a topic he was comfortable with.
Isaiah-
speech- I thought Isaiah spoke loud and clear but he didn't have the energy when he was talking. It sounded like he was his normal self. I feel like he should of put more energy and voice but I could understand him. He did stutter a couple times but it wasn't to bad. I think it's better if you stand up than sit down. I feel like that affects the tone of your voice.
Content- I didn't really learn a lot from him. He gave me the basic information about Aquaponics but he didn't give the important ones like how it works. He just said what it is and why it's good for the environment.
Tyler
Speech: hit mastery and target areas. Spoke in a level tone, and maintained posture. He seemed confident, and spoke at a good volume
Content: definitely hit mastery. Gave clear examples and had a broad knowledge and understanding of his topic. Gave the factual information and steps in his subject. Would’ve learned something if I didn’t know about the project.
Reyn:
Speech: spoke clearly and loudly. However, he fidgeted around a lot, making him seem nervous or uncomfortable. He is positive, however I feel like it got cut short.
Content: spoke about aquaponics facts, and had a good understanding of it. Speaking to an audience who knows nothing about aquaponics, it would work very well
Blaine:
His speech was overall okay but could be better. He spoke clearly most of the time and enunciated all of his words correctly. He could of spoke a lot louder since it was hard to hear what he was saying because of the wind. I wasn’t able to see if he maintain eye contact because he filmed it in a dark area where I couldn’t see his face. He didn’t fidget during his speech which was good. He used hand gestures sometimes during his speech for different points he made about aquaponics. Some of the information that he spoke about was clear and understandable. Sometimes he would start a sentence and then in the middle of the sentence he would go off into another sentence. He understood the basic of aquaponics by the content he talked about. He didn’t really go in detail with some topics that he talk about. The information that he said was factual and convincing by his confidence.
Reyn:
Reyn’s speech was mainly okay but had some minor improvements. He stuttered some times during the speech and would pause in a middle of a sentence. He stuttered probably because he didn’t know what to say next. He swayed around sometimes with his body when he spoke and had some unnecessary hand gestures. The hand gestures didn’t really help when he spoke. I couldn’t really see if he had eye contact with the camera because of the lighting in the area he was in was dark. He mumbled a couple of times in which I couldn’t understand what words he was saying.The content about aquaponics that he spoke about was true and factual. He understands most of the topic of aquaponics but seems a little unsure about different points that he said. Information he said seems understandable for the audience to learn something about aquaponics.
Marshall did a generally good job with his speech. He pronounced words correctly and talked with a fairly projected voice. He gave okay eye contact most of the time and looked at the camera. He seemed to fidget a little and look away from the camera sometimes. Doing that made him not seem as confident. He also could have been maybe a bit more positive rather than staying at one tone the entire time. I could see that he was putting his hands on something and I think that also helped him little more certain. Marshall’s content was accurate. He did a good job with saying how aquaponics works. I also like how he said that their group created the system. He said how first they started with a scale drawing and then moved to a prototype and so on. He said what he will be doing with the system like marketing it. Maybe he could have also added how his system works compared to other groups.
Tyler was very positive and seemed very comfortable while speaking. He gave good eye contact and used many hand motions but not too many. He had a good intro and ending with saying his name and also saying thank you. I like how he changed the volumes of certain words that were more important. He also pronounced words very well and had good facial expressions. The only thing is that sometimes he would repeat many words when he mentioned them such as like. Or he would use the word finally many times in a couple of sentences. The information about creating the aquaponic system was accurate. The only thing was that our growbed is actually not in the top but it is on the side. I liked how he talked about how difficult it was to put together and glue. He could have also stated what aquaponics is or how it works. He also focused mainly on putting it together but could have also talked more about other steps. Overall I think that he did a good job.
Matt- I think your speech was good. It felt like you had a real nice confidence. I think you did a good job of making yourself sound smarter than you would if you were not as confident. I also think you did a good job with your content. I would next time add a little more detail about what you do but good job otherwise.
Emma- I think you did a good job. You seemed really confident. I think one thing you could do is speak more loud. You spoke a little soft which made you seem a little less confident than you actually were. I thought your content was great and the best part. You gave good explanations of what you were talking about and it seemed very thought out. I like how you made it easy for someone that didn’t know what aquaponics was.
Trevor
He hit mastery on his speech because he spoke positively, more or less clearly and left you engaged. A very good pitch with good examples, this was one of the best ive seen.
His information had a good demonstration and was in depth so mastery.
Josh
I think that his speaking ability was diminished because of his choice of location. He also seemed unsure and really unhappy to be there meaning, he made me want to fall asleep. To improve, he needs to sit up, be confident and speak clearly. so Developing
He didn’t sound sure of his information and the content was lacking in many aspects. his delivery may have also attributed to this but this field is also in development.
Kai- He was a little stiff but still spoke clearly and confidently. He wasn’t swaying back and forth. His facts were relevant and useful.
Reyn- He was swaying back and forth but kind of hid it behind hand motions and slight turns of his body. But spoke clearly and confidently. He explained everything very well.
Fenton-I thought he was very confident in the way he spoke. As I was listening to him he seemed very happy to work with the listen, and made the listener comfortable. He also said a brief strong overview of what Aquaponics are. Also he gave his thought of what he thinks of it and what he thought when he first heard of it. I think next time he should make sure he looks at the camera, he never looked at in the video. Also he should not walk side to side.
Trevor-I thought he had a very visible way to show his content. I thought he did a very good job on the content. He talked about hydroponics. Also he showed the Aquaponic system layout with props. He also talked about the fish plants and water in the system. I also think he seemed very interested and happy. It made me want to listen. He talked like I was a friend. I think he could’ve talked about a little more about sustanibility.
Marshal- I think that marshal did a good job speaking his content was good. It was solid information and it was said in the right order the only thing that I had a problem with was the way you presented the information. You sounded very bored and uninterested. I think that also you kept look left and right. Everything else was good.
Kris-I think that you did an ok job it was weird when you scratched you nose that was not a good idea and you kept looking into space if you wanted to catch the persons attention that was a good idea but I don’t think that was positive attention. I also think that you have too many pauses in you speech. The content was used well and you went into good detail in each of the sentences.
IP- His information was good but the way he presented it was good it felt like the information was fake because he had no confidence in what he was saying he was also soft. When he is talking he looks around sometimes this is kind of distracting.
Kris k- During his speech he was thinking and looking all around he also had some break downs where he just lost it,but his information was good and people would have learned something from his speech.
Trevor:
I always saw Trevor as a great speaker. He always seemed confident in what he was talking about and it made me believe that what he was saying was true. Trevor had always spoken with a lot of enthusiasm and excitement meaning that he is really into what he is talking about. I thought that it was good that he used his resources by using his water bottle as the tank and his phone as the grow bed. Even though he is an extremely good speaker I feel that the content needs a few edits. He did not seem to know the real meaning of what aquaponics is. He got half of it right saying that aquaponics is a mix of hydroponics. Then, he said using the mix of hydroponics and growing fish and plants was a great blend. I think that the information being presented needs to be more factual.
Reyn:
Reyn was a really good presenter. I like how he started off by saying what aquaponics is and explaining how it works. Mentioning how nitrites are turned into nitrates really helps the content area. He was very good with persuasion. The tone and enthusiasm in his voice really catches peoples attention. The way he seems confident will get people into believing what he is saying is real and can be convinced into purchasing their product. He used hand gestures to help explain his model and what he was talking about. The information was correct and similar to some of the things I said in my 2 videos. Reyn reached the target of speaking and content.
Coltrane: I thought that coltranes video reached target. The reason for this was because he had great detail and explained everything well, but there were some awkward pauses where he looked completely stuck and had no idea what he would be saying next. His speech was very good other then a few stumbles. He enunciated well and spoke at a good volume. I liked his first explanation of what Aquaponics is and how he went into detail about what specifically the two components are the make up Aquaponics. Everything he stated were true facts that could become useful for the audience. He has good eye contact and doesn’t fidget around a lot but has good posture.
Alyssa: I think that Alyssa’s video could use a little improvement. To where it’s at the point where it is in-between target and needs development. Although at some points she stumbled along with her words she always kept continuing not stoping or making awkward motions. This made her seem more confident, or as if the pauses were maybe even planed out for her. Her eye contact and volume at which she talked we’re both very good. Everything she said was factual as well. The one major improvement that she would need would to fill in her long breaks where she looks a bit lost.
Tyler's speech was a target speech;
This is because he was quiet confident and had good movement but
ranted on and content wasn't too strong. He stood confidently, and
spoke in a calm voice but was a little monotone. Gestures and posture
was good. Guessing the sizes of everything looked unprofessional. I
did learn a bit about a design team and what steps are taking to
create a product. He didn't say something interesting or thought
provoking about aquaponics but he did interest me about his topic of
the steps and progress.
Coltrane's speech was target;
I believe this because it was mastery except his messing around and
off the cuff feeling. His speech was very direct and professional
except the beginning and end. His posture and voice was good, calm,
and persuasive. His hand gestures were too violent and sometimes gave
off a feeling of anxiety. His rare but fatal stumbles gave his speech
a very impromptu feeling and didn't seem prepared. His eye contact
swayed. Not much energy and enunciation sometimes faded softly.
Content was target to mastery. I was interested in what he was saying
the whole time. His information seemed thought through and with high
intelligence on the subject. Had factual info about aquaponics and I
learned from his speech.
Noah. I think he had a good process but sometimes he mumbled. He talked loud and clear but at times when he didn’t know what to say, he got soft and he started to mumble. His thought process was there most of the time and he sounded confident, but when he got stuck, his confidence went down and he started to mumble.
Blaine. Blaine talked loud and clear 90% of the time and he knew what he was gonna say before he said it and you could tell he was an expert on aquaponics because he sounded calm and relaxed like this was a topic he was comfortable with.
Isaiah-
speech- I thought Isaiah spoke loud and clear but he didn't have the energy when he was talking. It sounded like he was his normal self. I feel like he should of put more energy and voice but I could understand him. He did stutter a couple times but it wasn't to bad. I think it's better if you stand up than sit down. I feel like that affects the tone of your voice.
Content- I didn't really learn a lot from him. He gave me the basic information about Aquaponics but he didn't give the important ones like how it works. He just said what it is and why it's good for the environment.
Tyler
Speech: hit mastery and target areas. Spoke in a level tone, and maintained posture. He seemed confident, and spoke at a good volume
Content: definitely hit mastery. Gave clear examples and had a broad knowledge and understanding of his topic. Gave the factual information and steps in his subject. Would’ve learned something if I didn’t know about the project.
Reyn:
Speech: spoke clearly and loudly. However, he fidgeted around a lot, making him seem nervous or uncomfortable. He is positive, however I feel like it got cut short.
Content: spoke about aquaponics facts, and had a good understanding of it. Speaking to an audience who knows nothing about aquaponics, it would work very well
Blaine:
His speech was overall okay but could be better. He spoke clearly most of the time and enunciated all of his words correctly. He could of spoke a lot louder since it was hard to hear what he was saying because of the wind. I wasn’t able to see if he maintain eye contact because he filmed it in a dark area where I couldn’t see his face. He didn’t fidget during his speech which was good. He used hand gestures sometimes during his speech for different points he made about aquaponics. Some of the information that he spoke about was clear and understandable. Sometimes he would start a sentence and then in the middle of the sentence he would go off into another sentence. He understood the basic of aquaponics by the content he talked about. He didn’t really go in detail with some topics that he talk about. The information that he said was factual and convincing by his confidence.
Reyn:
Reyn’s speech was mainly okay but had some minor improvements. He stuttered some times during the speech and would pause in a middle of a sentence. He stuttered probably because he didn’t know what to say next. He swayed around sometimes with his body when he spoke and had some unnecessary hand gestures. The hand gestures didn’t really help when he spoke. I couldn’t really see if he had eye contact with the camera because of the lighting in the area he was in was dark. He mumbled a couple of times in which I couldn’t understand what words he was saying.The content about aquaponics that he spoke about was true and factual. He understands most of the topic of aquaponics but seems a little unsure about different points that he said. Information he said seems understandable for the audience to learn something about aquaponics.
Marshall did a generally good job with his speech. He pronounced words correctly and talked with a fairly projected voice. He gave okay eye contact most of the time and looked at the camera. He seemed to fidget a little and look away from the camera sometimes. Doing that made him not seem as confident. He also could have been maybe a bit more positive rather than staying at one tone the entire time. I could see that he was putting his hands on something and I think that also helped him little more certain. Marshall’s content was accurate. He did a good job with saying how aquaponics works. I also like how he said that their group created the system. He said how first they started with a scale drawing and then moved to a prototype and so on. He said what he will be doing with the system like marketing it. Maybe he could have also added how his system works compared to other groups.
Tyler was very positive and seemed very comfortable while speaking. He gave good eye contact and used many hand motions but not too many. He had a good intro and ending with saying his name and also saying thank you. I like how he changed the volumes of certain words that were more important. He also pronounced words very well and had good facial expressions. The only thing is that sometimes he would repeat many words when he mentioned them such as like. Or he would use the word finally many times in a couple of sentences. The information about creating the aquaponic system was accurate. The only thing was that our growbed is actually not in the top but it is on the side. I liked how he talked about how difficult it was to put together and glue. He could have also stated what aquaponics is or how it works. He also focused mainly on putting it together but could have also talked more about other steps. Overall I think that he did a good job.
Matt- I think your speech was good. It felt like you had a real nice confidence. I think you did a good job of making yourself sound smarter than you would if you were not as confident. I also think you did a good job with your content. I would next time add a little more detail about what you do but good job otherwise.
Emma- I think you did a good job. You seemed really confident. I think one thing you could do is speak more loud. You spoke a little soft which made you seem a little less confident than you actually were. I thought your content was great and the best part. You gave good explanations of what you were talking about and it seemed very thought out. I like how you made it easy for someone that didn’t know what aquaponics was.
Trevor
He hit mastery on his speech because he spoke positively, more or less clearly and left you engaged. A very good pitch with good examples, this was one of the best ive seen.
His information had a good demonstration and was in depth so mastery.
Josh
I think that his speaking ability was diminished because of his choice of location. He also seemed unsure and really unhappy to be there meaning, he made me want to fall asleep. To improve, he needs to sit up, be confident and speak clearly. so Developing
He didn’t sound sure of his information and the content was lacking in many aspects. his delivery may have also attributed to this but this field is also in development.
Kai- He was a little stiff but still spoke clearly and confidently. He wasn’t swaying back and forth. His facts were relevant and useful.
Reyn- He was swaying back and forth but kind of hid it behind hand motions and slight turns of his body. But spoke clearly and confidently. He explained everything very well.
Fenton-I thought he was very confident in the way he spoke. As I was listening to him he seemed very happy to work with the listen, and made the listener comfortable. He also said a brief strong overview of what Aquaponics are. Also he gave his thought of what he thinks of it and what he thought when he first heard of it. I think next time he should make sure he looks at the camera, he never looked at in the video. Also he should not walk side to side.
Trevor-I thought he had a very visible way to show his content. I thought he did a very good job on the content. He talked about hydroponics. Also he showed the Aquaponic system layout with props. He also talked about the fish plants and water in the system. I also think he seemed very interested and happy. It made me want to listen. He talked like I was a friend. I think he could’ve talked about a little more about sustanibility.
Marshal- I think that marshal did a good job speaking his content was good. It was solid information and it was said in the right order the only thing that I had a problem with was the way you presented the information. You sounded very bored and uninterested. I think that also you kept look left and right. Everything else was good.
Kris-I think that you did an ok job it was weird when you scratched you nose that was not a good idea and you kept looking into space if you wanted to catch the persons attention that was a good idea but I don’t think that was positive attention. I also think that you have too many pauses in you speech. The content was used well and you went into good detail in each of the sentences.
IP- His information was good but the way he presented it was good it felt like the information was fake because he had no confidence in what he was saying he was also soft. When he is talking he looks around sometimes this is kind of distracting.
Kris k- During his speech he was thinking and looking all around he also had some break downs where he just lost it,but his information was good and people would have learned something from his speech.