Josh’s: I thought that they seemed quite unsure and tended to say um frequently. Also seemed a little indecisive about their own project and seemed conflicted on much of the information they were presented. The location of the filming was noisy as well as distracting, and each member fidgeted. Also much of the voice tone sounded derisive and somewhat offensive for some reason. That said, this would be developing to target.
Team Josh:
Unprofessional language was used and it seemed like they were uneducated. They used fake words and it sounded weak. Answered questions correctly and well but also circled around a bit. There was no focus when others were talking. There was a lot of unrelated movement. No body paid attention to the other speakers. Didn’t sound very confident and all the movement gave off an anxious feeling. Not much enthusiasm.
Josh group:
I thought some of your answered were good I think you cold have expanded more on what Aquaponics is. Josh said um way too much and it was very distracting and I think he needs to work on that. I would have also liked if they were closer to the camera it was a little difficult to hear them. I thought they had good questions. They all had good posture there was no gum chewing and I thought they did a good job with that. The last thing I would fix is that they were too formal, they didn’t really have a conversation with each other and they didn’t engage in the conversation they looked into the camera most of the time.
Josh’s group had good information. They all seemed to know their facts well and could explain. I think that their content hit mastery because they did not pause to think which really showed that they knew what they were saying. I think that one thing that could be improved on is how they presented themselves. They could have used more hand motions in order to explain what was being. I think that rather than just having one person answer, it would be okay if another person jumped in if they had something to add to the answer. Their flow was good because they added to the answer to the question. I think that they did a good job with answering directly to the question. They did not go off topic and also answered right away after the question was being asked. One last thing that they could have improved on was their emotions. I think that some of them cold have shown how passionate they were with their system.
Team Josh: I think that Josh’s group also did a good job with this. They answered all the questions and went straight to the point. I also think that the information they gave was good because they didn’t go off topic and they told us facts in a way that people could understand. I think the people surrounding the speaker kind of seemed just… I don’t know, kind of bored. Because they stood completely still like statues while the other person was talking. i think that Josh projected his voice well and Sean and Marshall kind of spoke with less confidence than Josh. They were kind of far from the camera which was really weird so I couldn’t really hear any of them except Josh.
Team Coltrane: I think Coltrane’s team did a really good job with this. They had everyone speak and everyone spoke. When someone was talking, everyone else gave good body language and they didn’t looked tired or bored or appalled by what the speaker was talking about. I think everyone did a really good job but I think the “model” speaker (I guess you could call him that) of this group was Bryson, he spoke with confidence and he spoke clearly and he used hand motions that related to his speech. Maybe it’s just me but they kind of seemed to go off topic a little just to speak about their product in a better way but it kind of got confusing.
Coltrane’s group: I thought their introduction was very good. It was very smart how they introduced everybody and their job. After I heard the jobs to me it would give me a better understanding of what the group is doing. Another thing they did very well at was groups expression. While every person talked each group member was focused. Such as when Bradley talked the entire group looked at him. But it was a bit distracting cause they went at the same time. That’s the needs improvement. They hit target on the information they could’ve talked a little more. And hit mastery on their intro.
Coltrane’s Group: Their group was overall good but had some improvements. They looked somewhat confident in what they were saying. Sometimes they stuttered and paused when they spoke. They look a little more enthusiastic compared to the other speeches. They used lots of hand gestures which were excellent and some helped to understand what they were saying. The content seems true and somewhat specific. On one question about if being 9th graders is an advantage or disadvantage they went off topic a little bit and over answered the question. Most of the time they didn’t fidget or do anything distracting.
Team Coltrane did a good job with answering questions. They had a good presence but in the beginning, I feel like they did not know where to look. They would either look at the audience or at the person. When the first person started to talk, they were all looking at him and then when the next person talked, they would almost all look forward. I think that could be improved. I like how they did not interrupt each other very much. They all had a lot to say and could explain every answer very well. They were well prepared to answer the questions so that would be mastery. I really liked how they used their hand motions because it went well with what they were saying. Some of them were saying many “ummms” or “uhhh”. I think that they did a good job with trying to turn a negative statement into a more positive statement. They also made their answers flow by leading into another positive aspect about their system. Their information was overall accurate and truthful.
Team Coltrane: I thought his group answered the questions with lots of detail and clarity. I think the only thing I would criticize this group was they didn’t really look at there person presenting they just stared into the camera. I think they all kept good posture and they weren’t doing any thing distracting or fiddling with anything. They were kind of too formal I would have liked it better if they talked in a kind of casual way and were having a conversation with each other
Coltrane - This group answered there questions very well. At the start of the video one person was talking and everybody else’s head was turned staring straight at the guy. This looked like a bunch of robots. They didn’t do it so much the rest of the video but they still all stared at one guy sometimes. They answered there question with confidence and composer. The talking was fluent. None of the group member did distracting motions while they were speaking no swaying or playing with their shirt. They used there hands to show things motions it benefited them.
group coltrane:
Each speaker took was rushing a little to answer each question, but it wasn’t bad, it just seemed eager which is good. The team members took turns which is good and each other member stayed focused and listened most of the time. I saw some unrelated and distracting hand motions and movement but nothing drastic. Each voice was quite calm and confident but stumbled a little hear and there. Posture was also good.
Team Krislyn: I liked Krislyn, Trevor and Blaine’s speeches. They spoke well and they introduced themselves before talking so we knew who they were and what they were called. Blaine kept fidgeting with his legs but I like how he talked and answered the questions, I wouldn’t really expect it form Blaine. I think the information they gave was good and they all spoke with confidence.
Team Kris:
Each speaker took turns and waited which is good, but they didn’t keep focused. They didn’t pay attention to the other speaker, and was moving around. Blaine was distracting and was doing unrelated and unprofessional motions. Each speaker finished each question with like a drop off or just like had a weak ending, which gave the feeling of a bad answer. Couldn’t understand the end because a car drove by or something. Posture was good and they answer each question well except that they went around in circles a bit with the answers.
KRIS-
Trevor’s group was also very good. They answered the question with depth to it they didn’t just stop after a boring little sentence. All of the members answered with confidence, and knew what they were talking about. They look right at the camera the pretty much the whole they could vary were they looked. During the video blaine would put his hands on his knees and move them back and forth which was kind of distracting.
Kris’ Group: This group was good especially the content part. They answer the question well because they didn’t pause or stutter when they spoke. The only improvement is that they should speak a lot louder because I had to max out the volume to hear them. Also that they should be more enthusiastic and look happier or smile sometimes when they spoke. They had good content in their answers which had lots of detail and evidence. Most of the time one group mate was fidgeting with his legs and was looking at the ground sometimes.
Krislyn’s: Sounded quite scripted at first, but in time the began a more natural conversational flow. I think that they provided accurate answers, but delivered it in an unsure, not quite engaging way. Blain looked nervous while clenching his legs and trevor was flashing the camera, I thought this was high target and their speech was alright.
Kris’ Group: I thought that kris’ group did a good job of answering these questions. One comment that I noticed was that when Bradley was answering the first question that was being asked to him all the other three people who weren’t talking directly turned their heads and stared at him. As well when they introduced themselves and all the different roles that each person had they looked dead. Like they had no enthusiasm what so ever in their product that they were trying to present or in the things they were saying.
Blaine and Trevor’s group: I think they could’ve done had the presentation in an in closed room so it’s quiet. There was a lot of background noise. They hit target on the information the seemed like they just gave the minimum. They could’ve said more about sustainability. I think they need development on the group distractions. Trevor and Blaine kept looking around and not paying attention. Also they all should speak equally. Kristlyn seemed like the one that talked the whole time.
Blaines Group: I think that Krislyn maintained good posture throughout the whole thing and Blaine and Trevor could work on staying still rather still. This is because they were moving around a lot when they weren’t talking and also when they were talking. As well they were kind of slouching when they were talking and their group member was talking. I thought that the way that they answered the questions was good as well because they didn’t use a lot of ums or likes but were strait to the point and were very clear with what they were saying.
Team Josh:
Unprofessional language was used and it seemed like they were uneducated. They used fake words and it sounded weak. Answered questions correctly and well but also circled around a bit. There was no focus when others were talking. There was a lot of unrelated movement. No body paid attention to the other speakers. Didn’t sound very confident and all the movement gave off an anxious feeling. Not much enthusiasm.
Josh group:
I thought some of your answered were good I think you cold have expanded more on what Aquaponics is. Josh said um way too much and it was very distracting and I think he needs to work on that. I would have also liked if they were closer to the camera it was a little difficult to hear them. I thought they had good questions. They all had good posture there was no gum chewing and I thought they did a good job with that. The last thing I would fix is that they were too formal, they didn’t really have a conversation with each other and they didn’t engage in the conversation they looked into the camera most of the time.
Josh’s group had good information. They all seemed to know their facts well and could explain. I think that their content hit mastery because they did not pause to think which really showed that they knew what they were saying. I think that one thing that could be improved on is how they presented themselves. They could have used more hand motions in order to explain what was being. I think that rather than just having one person answer, it would be okay if another person jumped in if they had something to add to the answer. Their flow was good because they added to the answer to the question. I think that they did a good job with answering directly to the question. They did not go off topic and also answered right away after the question was being asked. One last thing that they could have improved on was their emotions. I think that some of them cold have shown how passionate they were with their system.
Team Josh: I think that Josh’s group also did a good job with this. They answered all the questions and went straight to the point. I also think that the information they gave was good because they didn’t go off topic and they told us facts in a way that people could understand. I think the people surrounding the speaker kind of seemed just… I don’t know, kind of bored. Because they stood completely still like statues while the other person was talking. i think that Josh projected his voice well and Sean and Marshall kind of spoke with less confidence than Josh. They were kind of far from the camera which was really weird so I couldn’t really hear any of them except Josh.
Team Coltrane: I think Coltrane’s team did a really good job with this. They had everyone speak and everyone spoke. When someone was talking, everyone else gave good body language and they didn’t looked tired or bored or appalled by what the speaker was talking about. I think everyone did a really good job but I think the “model” speaker (I guess you could call him that) of this group was Bryson, he spoke with confidence and he spoke clearly and he used hand motions that related to his speech. Maybe it’s just me but they kind of seemed to go off topic a little just to speak about their product in a better way but it kind of got confusing.
Coltrane’s group: I thought their introduction was very good. It was very smart how they introduced everybody and their job. After I heard the jobs to me it would give me a better understanding of what the group is doing. Another thing they did very well at was groups expression. While every person talked each group member was focused. Such as when Bradley talked the entire group looked at him. But it was a bit distracting cause they went at the same time. That’s the needs improvement. They hit target on the information they could’ve talked a little more. And hit mastery on their intro.
Coltrane’s Group: Their group was overall good but had some improvements. They looked somewhat confident in what they were saying. Sometimes they stuttered and paused when they spoke. They look a little more enthusiastic compared to the other speeches. They used lots of hand gestures which were excellent and some helped to understand what they were saying. The content seems true and somewhat specific. On one question about if being 9th graders is an advantage or disadvantage they went off topic a little bit and over answered the question. Most of the time they didn’t fidget or do anything distracting.
Team Coltrane did a good job with answering questions. They had a good presence but in the beginning, I feel like they did not know where to look. They would either look at the audience or at the person. When the first person started to talk, they were all looking at him and then when the next person talked, they would almost all look forward. I think that could be improved. I like how they did not interrupt each other very much. They all had a lot to say and could explain every answer very well. They were well prepared to answer the questions so that would be mastery. I really liked how they used their hand motions because it went well with what they were saying. Some of them were saying many “ummms” or “uhhh”. I think that they did a good job with trying to turn a negative statement into a more positive statement. They also made their answers flow by leading into another positive aspect about their system. Their information was overall accurate and truthful.
Team Coltrane: I thought his group answered the questions with lots of detail and clarity. I think the only thing I would criticize this group was they didn’t really look at there person presenting they just stared into the camera. I think they all kept good posture and they weren’t doing any thing distracting or fiddling with anything. They were kind of too formal I would have liked it better if they talked in a kind of casual way and were having a conversation with each other
Coltrane - This group answered there questions very well. At the start of the video one person was talking and everybody else’s head was turned staring straight at the guy. This looked like a bunch of robots. They didn’t do it so much the rest of the video but they still all stared at one guy sometimes. They answered there question with confidence and composer. The talking was fluent. None of the group member did distracting motions while they were speaking no swaying or playing with their shirt. They used there hands to show things motions it benefited them.
group coltrane:
Each speaker took was rushing a little to answer each question, but it wasn’t bad, it just seemed eager which is good. The team members took turns which is good and each other member stayed focused and listened most of the time. I saw some unrelated and distracting hand motions and movement but nothing drastic. Each voice was quite calm and confident but stumbled a little hear and there. Posture was also good.
Team Krislyn: I liked Krislyn, Trevor and Blaine’s speeches. They spoke well and they introduced themselves before talking so we knew who they were and what they were called. Blaine kept fidgeting with his legs but I like how he talked and answered the questions, I wouldn’t really expect it form Blaine. I think the information they gave was good and they all spoke with confidence.
Team Kris:
Each speaker took turns and waited which is good, but they didn’t keep focused. They didn’t pay attention to the other speaker, and was moving around. Blaine was distracting and was doing unrelated and unprofessional motions. Each speaker finished each question with like a drop off or just like had a weak ending, which gave the feeling of a bad answer. Couldn’t understand the end because a car drove by or something. Posture was good and they answer each question well except that they went around in circles a bit with the answers.
KRIS-
Trevor’s group was also very good. They answered the question with depth to it they didn’t just stop after a boring little sentence. All of the members answered with confidence, and knew what they were talking about. They look right at the camera the pretty much the whole they could vary were they looked. During the video blaine would put his hands on his knees and move them back and forth which was kind of distracting.
Kris’ Group: This group was good especially the content part. They answer the question well because they didn’t pause or stutter when they spoke. The only improvement is that they should speak a lot louder because I had to max out the volume to hear them. Also that they should be more enthusiastic and look happier or smile sometimes when they spoke. They had good content in their answers which had lots of detail and evidence. Most of the time one group mate was fidgeting with his legs and was looking at the ground sometimes.
Krislyn’s: Sounded quite scripted at first, but in time the began a more natural conversational flow. I think that they provided accurate answers, but delivered it in an unsure, not quite engaging way. Blain looked nervous while clenching his legs and trevor was flashing the camera, I thought this was high target and their speech was alright.
Kris’ Group: I thought that kris’ group did a good job of answering these questions. One comment that I noticed was that when Bradley was answering the first question that was being asked to him all the other three people who weren’t talking directly turned their heads and stared at him. As well when they introduced themselves and all the different roles that each person had they looked dead. Like they had no enthusiasm what so ever in their product that they were trying to present or in the things they were saying.
Blaine and Trevor’s group: I think they could’ve done had the presentation in an in closed room so it’s quiet. There was a lot of background noise. They hit target on the information the seemed like they just gave the minimum. They could’ve said more about sustainability. I think they need development on the group distractions. Trevor and Blaine kept looking around and not paying attention. Also they all should speak equally. Kristlyn seemed like the one that talked the whole time.
Blaines Group: I think that Krislyn maintained good posture throughout the whole thing and Blaine and Trevor could work on staying still rather still. This is because they were moving around a lot when they weren’t talking and also when they were talking. As well they were kind of slouching when they were talking and their group member was talking. I thought that the way that they answered the questions was good as well because they didn’t use a lot of ums or likes but were strait to the point and were very clear with what they were saying.