received as of 7:30 am based on expert round 2
Trevor: Trevor’s expert speech I thought was done very well. His body positioning, although he was sitting on the ground, was still nice. He looked very confident and shared his knowledge very well. I liked the way that he presented the information as well, it made the audience a lot more interested in his topic and get more into it. Something that I think he could possibly improve on would be that he has some little breaks where he begins to think and you can see him rethinking what he is about to say.
Kai: I. Thought that guys was great. The way that he edited around certain clips of different videos in different environments and edited his videos on iMovie seemed very professional. The way he was speaking was very fluent and clear and loud. He didn’t fidget around just noticed that he put one hand in his pocket but it didn’t look like anything out of the ordinary and just looked natural for him. The only negative thing about the video would be that he had a lot of background noise which can’t necessarily always be helped.
Kai:
I thought that Kai’s video was unique in what he did. Instead of just putting his face onto the screen, he put it more into an entertaining video. He put together his speech in a way where people want to watch it. I thought that his voice flowed very well. It was really convincing by his enthusiasm and really made it sound like he knew his topic very well. He did not stutter or tremble and looked at the camera the entire time. The way he used the nature around him was very helpful. Kai was positive the whole time and he spoke with full confidence as if he were trying to sell the product already.
Kai:
His speech was very good. He had great eye contact with the camera. He didn’t stutter which showed that he had confident when he spoke. He was positive and showed passion towards his idea of aquaponics. He didn’t fidget or look at the ground constantly which showed that he was focused towards his speech. He spoke very clear and loud to the camera.
Blaine:
His speech was overall pretty good. He had good eye contact with the camera and had excellent clear speaking. He didn’t stutter or make any major mistakes. He looked confident enough for this speech. He did make a sound with his mouth during the speech a couple of times. He could of been more passionate or enthusiastic towards his idea because of the way he talked.
Blaine: Blaine did a good job with volume and fluency. He did not stop very much and seemed like he knew what he was talking about. He was confident and used hand motions well. He did not show much change throughout his voice. I think one thing that he could have done was add a little more emotion into what he was saying. Other than that, I think he did well. He also had good posture.
Sean: Good volume and pronunciation. He seemed pretty positive. He had a strong beginning and middle but seemed to struggle towards the end. He may have repeated some things to keep a steadier flow. He could have been a little more confident. Also, he could have used more hand motions and emotion similar to what Blaine could improve on.
Marshall:
Marshall did very well. He reached the target by speaking without stuttering and knowing his topic very well. By the way Marshall talked your statistics were very convincing and was really smart of you to use because it made it seem that you knew your topic even better with evidence. By the tone of your voice I felt that you were sure of what you were saying and you were positive about it the whole time. Overall I thought your speech about whales was very smooth and well put together.
emma critique
i think that she did an excelent job as far as i can see she did not fidget or do anything distracting. she did a good job not saying um or other staling words. he had movements and words matched. she did not repeat anying our make unnessacery points. all in all good job.
Emma
Emma is a wonderful speaker, she speaks without moving or doing anything that shows that she is nervous. She just sits in a tree and talks About biodevisty wonderful. Great speaker, onl
Y comment I can make is just to keep on the grind because you are flawless.
Isiah p-
Isaiah actually did a good job of what he said, because everything he was saying sounded true, not Makeing up facts it sounded real. He does stutter a little which could easily be fixed but overall good job.
isaiah P- He knew what we was talking about and the words really flowed out of his mouth. I think he need to work on sitting more up right and speak out more because he comes of as shy to me. I think if he sits up straight it will demonstrate confidence.
Reyn- He had paused and stuttered quite a bit but spoke confidently and sold his story really well.
Fenton- He was good, he used pauses sparingly and spoke loud and clear. He was really confident in what he had spoken.
THE matthew fenton experience- I think matt did a great job this time around as well. Matt used a great voice that was extremely confident, projected well, spoke clearly and he sounded like he had been playing the game forever haha he sounded amazing. But he would use too many hand motions and he would slap his knee too much and that was a distraction but otherwise i would say amazing job„ 8.5/10
Ip - I think Isaiah did a good job with his information and he really knew what he was talking about but his voice was very mono-tone the whole time which is bad i couldn’t really hear him and he also was looking out into space and around at random things a lot „ 6.5/10
Kris K-
He spoke with much confidence in his voice. He spoke like he knew that topic very well and gave examples of his topic that had happened or that were being done. I thing he did was look off to the right and in this case the camera is the vocal point so he should have been looking at us, but he was sitting up right with good posture.
kris K critique
he has a very strong voice and it seems like he knows what he is taling about. the only think that i thought was unessacery was the tone of his voice he went up and down a lot and that was distracting. i also think that he did a very good job with the content of the information. there was no repeated sentenses or points and he did not go into usless topics that were unnessecary. i could not tell if he was fidgeting or doing things with his hands because it was only his face in the video.
Noah f- I thought noah spoke loud but it wasn't the clearest. I could understand him but I think for the pitches you have to me a lot more understandable. He did good job looking comfortable but I think he should have a better posture. He lacked the energy and didn't seem positive.
Isaiah- I thought he spoke loud in clear. I could understand him well. He did a good job at using his hands. I thought he looked comfortable and wasn't boring
Trevor: Trevor’s expert speech I thought was done very well. His body positioning, although he was sitting on the ground, was still nice. He looked very confident and shared his knowledge very well. I liked the way that he presented the information as well, it made the audience a lot more interested in his topic and get more into it. Something that I think he could possibly improve on would be that he has some little breaks where he begins to think and you can see him rethinking what he is about to say.
Kai: I. Thought that guys was great. The way that he edited around certain clips of different videos in different environments and edited his videos on iMovie seemed very professional. The way he was speaking was very fluent and clear and loud. He didn’t fidget around just noticed that he put one hand in his pocket but it didn’t look like anything out of the ordinary and just looked natural for him. The only negative thing about the video would be that he had a lot of background noise which can’t necessarily always be helped.
Kai:
I thought that Kai’s video was unique in what he did. Instead of just putting his face onto the screen, he put it more into an entertaining video. He put together his speech in a way where people want to watch it. I thought that his voice flowed very well. It was really convincing by his enthusiasm and really made it sound like he knew his topic very well. He did not stutter or tremble and looked at the camera the entire time. The way he used the nature around him was very helpful. Kai was positive the whole time and he spoke with full confidence as if he were trying to sell the product already.
Kai:
His speech was very good. He had great eye contact with the camera. He didn’t stutter which showed that he had confident when he spoke. He was positive and showed passion towards his idea of aquaponics. He didn’t fidget or look at the ground constantly which showed that he was focused towards his speech. He spoke very clear and loud to the camera.
Blaine:
His speech was overall pretty good. He had good eye contact with the camera and had excellent clear speaking. He didn’t stutter or make any major mistakes. He looked confident enough for this speech. He did make a sound with his mouth during the speech a couple of times. He could of been more passionate or enthusiastic towards his idea because of the way he talked.
Blaine: Blaine did a good job with volume and fluency. He did not stop very much and seemed like he knew what he was talking about. He was confident and used hand motions well. He did not show much change throughout his voice. I think one thing that he could have done was add a little more emotion into what he was saying. Other than that, I think he did well. He also had good posture.
Sean: Good volume and pronunciation. He seemed pretty positive. He had a strong beginning and middle but seemed to struggle towards the end. He may have repeated some things to keep a steadier flow. He could have been a little more confident. Also, he could have used more hand motions and emotion similar to what Blaine could improve on.
Marshall:
Marshall did very well. He reached the target by speaking without stuttering and knowing his topic very well. By the way Marshall talked your statistics were very convincing and was really smart of you to use because it made it seem that you knew your topic even better with evidence. By the tone of your voice I felt that you were sure of what you were saying and you were positive about it the whole time. Overall I thought your speech about whales was very smooth and well put together.
emma critique
i think that she did an excelent job as far as i can see she did not fidget or do anything distracting. she did a good job not saying um or other staling words. he had movements and words matched. she did not repeat anying our make unnessacery points. all in all good job.
Emma
Emma is a wonderful speaker, she speaks without moving or doing anything that shows that she is nervous. She just sits in a tree and talks About biodevisty wonderful. Great speaker, onl
Y comment I can make is just to keep on the grind because you are flawless.
Isiah p-
Isaiah actually did a good job of what he said, because everything he was saying sounded true, not Makeing up facts it sounded real. He does stutter a little which could easily be fixed but overall good job.
isaiah P- He knew what we was talking about and the words really flowed out of his mouth. I think he need to work on sitting more up right and speak out more because he comes of as shy to me. I think if he sits up straight it will demonstrate confidence.
Reyn- He had paused and stuttered quite a bit but spoke confidently and sold his story really well.
Fenton- He was good, he used pauses sparingly and spoke loud and clear. He was really confident in what he had spoken.
THE matthew fenton experience- I think matt did a great job this time around as well. Matt used a great voice that was extremely confident, projected well, spoke clearly and he sounded like he had been playing the game forever haha he sounded amazing. But he would use too many hand motions and he would slap his knee too much and that was a distraction but otherwise i would say amazing job„ 8.5/10
Ip - I think Isaiah did a good job with his information and he really knew what he was talking about but his voice was very mono-tone the whole time which is bad i couldn’t really hear him and he also was looking out into space and around at random things a lot „ 6.5/10
Kris K-
He spoke with much confidence in his voice. He spoke like he knew that topic very well and gave examples of his topic that had happened or that were being done. I thing he did was look off to the right and in this case the camera is the vocal point so he should have been looking at us, but he was sitting up right with good posture.
kris K critique
he has a very strong voice and it seems like he knows what he is taling about. the only think that i thought was unessacery was the tone of his voice he went up and down a lot and that was distracting. i also think that he did a very good job with the content of the information. there was no repeated sentenses or points and he did not go into usless topics that were unnessecary. i could not tell if he was fidgeting or doing things with his hands because it was only his face in the video.
Noah f- I thought noah spoke loud but it wasn't the clearest. I could understand him but I think for the pitches you have to me a lot more understandable. He did good job looking comfortable but I think he should have a better posture. He lacked the energy and didn't seem positive.
Isaiah- I thought he spoke loud in clear. I could understand him well. He did a good job at using his hands. I thought he looked comfortable and wasn't boring